Blog

Authored by Scott Pinsker via PJ Media,

This is an actual, real-life newspaper headline that ran today on planet Earth: 

Tim Walz: Maga voters are scared of my masculinity

And to clarify, that headline ran on OUR planet Earth. Not on an alternate dimension or some MCU-ish multiverse version of Earth, where all the bad guys have goatees. To paraphrase “Seinfeld,” that headline is 100% real — and it’s spectacular!

Tim Walz made the startling declaration on the podcast of the equally manly Gavin Newsom, the well-coifed governor of California. Here’s their exchange:

Tim Walz is so masculine, Bud Lite will be issuing him his own can. (Probably.)

Either way, the (inadvertent?) emasculation was off the charts: Clearly, Tim Walz wanted to play the Alpha card, but Newsom no-sold his Y chromosome. When someone tells you they’re scary and intimidating, TRUST ME, they don’t want to be met with hysterical laughter.

That’s no way to treat a lady!

So Masculine…

But according to Walz, the GOP attacks worked:

I’m baffled that he’s baffled: If he’s acknowledging that the attacks worked and were successful, then doesn’t that explain why MAGA used it? It’s like being mystified why the batter swung on a slow-moving pitch over the middle of the plate.

The article continued:

The Democrats already tried to play the “Walz is Manly” card in 2024. And not only the Democrats — the Never Trump Nitwits tried to sell it, too. Like ex-Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele: “What Walz offers is probably the more traditionally and actually appropriate view of what a 'real man' is. He's a father, he's a coach, he's at times a disciplinarian, he's the guy who's going to help you fix your car. I think he's a phenomenal role model.”

In fact, right after Steele’s quote, this paragraph appeared in the USA Today story (“Football coach and cheerleader: How Tim Walz is defining masculinity in 2024”):

What could be more “traditionally manly” than pride parades and abortion clinics? Nice reporting, USA Today!

Steele wasn’t the only Never Trumper to extol Walz’s, er, “testicular credentials.” There was this gem from Mona Charen (from her column, “Tim Walz is a man’s man, unlike MAGA’s man-children”):

Whether it’s Never Trumpers, the DNC, or Walz himself, the core problem remains unchanged: The Democrats want to redefine our definition of “masculinity.” The public doesn’t agree with their definition. But instead of backing off, they’re doubling down, insisting everyone else is wrong.

It’s like that “Latinx” nonsense, where guilty white liberals took it upon themselves to render the Spanish language “gender-neutral” — ignoring the protests of Spanish-speaking people. No matter how many times Latinos and Hispanics told them they wanted to honor their heritage and retain their language, guilty white liberals insisted they were “Latinx”… and then they wondered why Trump made record-setting gains with non-white voters.

The Democrats lost the male vote, so they want to redefine what a man is. Sorry, donkeys, but it doesn’t work that way.

We’ll leave the last word to Caitlyn Jenner: