Blog

The Atlantic has published the fuller chat thread from the Signal group that journalist Jeffrey Goldberg was 'inadvertently' included in. This comes after the top Trump officials involved denied that they shared secret "attack plans" in an unsecure, unclassified setting. The President has downplayed it, defending both national security adviser Mike Walz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, has called for both Hegseth Waltz to either resign or be fired from their top national security posts.

"When the stakes are this high, incompetence is not an option," Warner wrote on social media Tuesday. "Pete Hegseth should resign. Mike Waltz should resign."

And in a a letter to President Trump, House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries has urged Hegseth's termination, calling him "unqualified" and a national security risk.

"The so-called secretary of defense recklessly and casually disclosed highly sensitive war plans — including the timing of a pending attack, possible strike targets and the weapons to be used — during an unclassified national security group chat that inexplicably included a reporter," Jeffries wrote. "His behavior shocks the conscience, risked American lives and likely violated the law."

The newly published messages were sent on March 15 and purport to be from an account identified as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Amid the ongoing controversy, Golberg and The Atlantic are seeking to present a 'smoking gun' of sorts.

The messages include times of strikes and the types of aircraft being used in attacks on Yemen's Houthis, who have for many months been sending drone and missiles against Red Sea shipping, including American warships and even at times a carrier.

The Atlantic wrote as part of the Wednesday release of the fuller messages, "There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in nonsecure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared."

The magazine further stated, "If this text had been received by someone hostile to American interests – or someone merely indiscreet, and with access to social media – the Houthis would have had time to prepare for what was meant to be a surprise attack on their strongholds. The consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic."

Below is a key message from the Signal group, seen among top national security officials as well as Jeffrey Goldberg: 

And more from the 'debrief' portion or aftermath of what was apparently the first round of strikes:

Fresh reaction from Vice President JD Vance:

The Atlantic, after coming under attack from people within the US administration, has urged, "People should see the texts in order to reach their own conclusions."

* * *

But this is ultimately the bigger issue which very few are talking about, as Washington embarks on more military adventurism in the Middle East…

The most "DC" thing ever is to reflexively twist the Signal chat story into a scandal over "classified information" and "OPSEC," rather than a scandal over a military operation that was launched on highly dubious pretenses by people such as Hegseth, who is clearly frothing for a war to command, and communicates his desires in the most simple-minded cliches. Nobody ever applies consistent principles to the retention or transmission of "classified information," and pretending to care about the sacrosanct nature of such information above all else is just standard DC pablum.

And…

Above: We present to you… the bigger, actual scandal.